• Simple searches use one or more words. Separate the words with spaces (cat dog) to search cat,dog or both. Separate the words with plus signs (cat +dog) to search for items that may contain cat but must contain dog. • You can further refine your search on the search results page, where you can search by keywords, author, topic.

These can be combined with each other. Examples • cat dog --matches anything with cat,dog or both • cat +dog --searches for cat +dog where dog is a mandatory term • cat -dog -- searches for cat excluding any result containing dog • [cats] —will restrict your search to results with topic named 'cats' • [cats] [dogs] —will restrict your search to results with both topics, 'cats', and 'dogs'. The official Mac SDK requires a Mac while the official Windows SDK requires Windows, hence the current setup. This isn't something we plan to change so it isn't on the roadmap. There's a couple of important reasons: 1. The EULA for the Mac OS X SDK forbids use on non-Apple branded hardware so we can't build for Mac from Windows as there's no alternative to the official SDK. There are alternative SDKs for Windows that allow building some applications from POSIX OSes (like OS X & Linux) but UE4 won't compile through them.

So I thought I would chime in here and somewhat defend the situation that Epic faces. For those talking about how Unity is able to.Unity does not compile its engine on the platform you are targeting when you package your game up, it in fact is packaging your game up to run on preexisting 'player'. The game logic runs on top of that player through a public facing API (thats how their engine is C++, but scripting is in C# for example) for that specific platform which is already compiled. Unreal compiles by platform at package time, maybe thats something that could change for UE5. But there are performance impacts with that approach which I'm sure Epic staff is well aware of:) Let's face it, right now UE has a competitive performance advantage because of it. Food for thought at the very least:).

Today we are announcing that Unity 5.6 will be the last release to ship with 32-bit builds of the editor for Windows. Read on to learn more about our reasoning behind this decision, and for further details on what to expect. For some time we have been thinking about when would be the right time to deprecate and ultimately end support for 32-bit versions of the Unity editor. Two years ago, the arrival of the 64-bit editor let most users deal with previous resource constraints and memory limitation issues; however there are still legacy 32-bit native plugins that keep some users behind. Even with that, it won’t come as a surprise to many to learn that usage of Unity on 32-bit Windows is pretty low compared to other OSs, and furthermore that it has been declining over the past few years. Additionally, as this OS continues to age, our cost of supporting it continues to rise. We already knew that usage of Unity on 32-bit Windows was low, but naturally we wanted to back up any decision to drop support with hard data, so we dived into our telemetry database in order to extract and analyse statistics on a couple of fronts: • Comparing overall editor starts between 32-bit and 64-bit, we confirmed that use on 32-bit has declined steadily from 6.2% 12 months ago to 4.7% today.

IOS publishing without a Mac. I would like to have the option to create an iOS app with one click within Unity for Windows/Linux. On windows, so the build server (on mac) could build them without extra modifications. Sep 03, 2012 18:06. That is why it is my choice for development! Jorge Aldana. Bought a unity asset package in a unofficial store. It's supposed to be a unitypackage but by macbook sees it as just a folder and I can't import it. The package was build on a windows computer.

• And if we look at the number of unique users on each type of build for the last 30 days we see very similar numbers: just 5.6% on 32-bit. Having had the numbers confirm our suspicions we wanted to reach out to the community to get a feel for the reception we would get from dropping support for 32-bit Windows editor. Overall the feedback was very positive: • We and out of 471 votes, only 11 (2.7%) were cast in favour of the 32-bit editor. • No concerns whatsoever were raised on our Alpha users’ group. • On our Beta users’ group the feedback was also largely positive, with some of you even surprised that we still had a 32-bit editor build! One noteworthy issue was raised, concerning the fact that that some users are running custom 32-bit only plugins for Unity, and would have to either update those plugins or stay on the final 32-bit version of the editor.